The question does make visible again the great difficulties of living as a citizen of the Kingdom of God and as a citizen of any nation. The events of the death of Bin Laden and the means by which he was killed place a follower of Jesus in a great bind. These decisions and these actions, it seems to me, demonstrate the great tension of being "in the world, but not of the world." Jesus told us we have to be wise as serpents and as innocent as doves.
There are rights, duties, obligations and privileges that come from being a part of a nation. St. Paul even acknowledged that such powers were established for the welfare and happiness of society. But those obligations and duties, those choices, those decisions often are obligations, decisions and duties that run counter to the ethics of the kingdom of God. The world is still the fallen creation that has not yet become the fully realized Kingdom of God. To fulfill the obligations of the Constitution of one country will bring each of us into conflicts with what we understand our obligations as citizens of the Kingdom of God are. It was for this reason, I think, that Martin Luther urged us a believers to sin boldly, and believe in forgiveness.
Would Jesus have approved the assault on Bin Laden? The torture, the invasion of another country (we seem to be getting pretty comfortable with doing that) the assassination? There is a big part of me that does not think that would have been his way, but the President has different choices, different obligations, different responsibilities and only God will be able to judge whether that was justice or not. That is why we depend so much on grace.
No comments:
Post a Comment