I would not have guessed it, if I had been asked, but yesterday at the meeting someone mentioned that we Presbyterians had been debating this issue for the last 33 years. For almost as long as I have been a minister, we have been arguing over who is eligible for ordination. I certainly hope this is the last time we see this issue.
We have spent 33 years arguing, voting, debating, fussing over whether or not gay and lesbian people might be ordained to the offices of Deacon, Elders, and Ministers of the Word and Sacrament. That is a lot of time invested in one very small issue. During that same time we were living through a huge economic bubble that was fueled primarily by GREED. In that same period of time we have developed a national health care problem of obesity, which seems to speak of GLUTTONY. As a nation we have strutted around the world in hubris and arrogance, which is PRIDE. We have great evidence that there is still horrible slave traffic in young women for sexual activities, which is LUST. And the Presbyterian bodies have been focused on the sin of homosexuality and have tended to remain rather silent on the other sins.
In the old questions and answers of the confessions, sin is "any want of conformity or transgression of the Will of God." And the Bible does list Homosexuality as a sin. So lets not argue about that. Even if we believe they were born that way, we are all supposed to believe we were all born into sin. So calling homosexuality a sin is not a great help in moving the discussion along.
The real question is always what do you do with the sinner. We have lots of divorced people who have remarried who are ordained and accepted as leaders, but the Bible calls them adulterers. And we do not demand that they divorce again. We have many aggressive business people who might even say they were greedy, but we do not prohibit them from holding office. One would hate to ask how many people in a congregation have looked at a Playboy centerfold with admiration. But we do not exclude them from ordination if they are selected by a congregation.
We just need to stop wasting our time, our energy, our passion on this tiny part of the population and get on with larger issues of loving justice, doing mercy and worshipping God.
I hope this is the last time we vote.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Monday, February 16, 2009
In response to Glory
I have just returned from a wonderful week of "rehabbing" an old house in New Orleans for a victim of Hurricane Katrina. It was for me a wonderful week. I had something to do all week. I love doing that kind of work, and there were great people to work with. So there is a part of me that can identify with Peter in the story of the Transfiguration (Mark 9:2-9). That is the story when Jesus takes three of his disciples up a mountain, and he is transfigured. Jesus is clothed in splendor and encounters Elijah and Moses. Caught up in that moment of amazement, wonder, mystery, and glory, the first thought Peter has is to build something. Peter says something like, Golly, this is great that we were here. Let's build three booths. One for each of them.
It is equally fascinating to me that Jesus completely ignores that suggestion. Certainly Peter demonstrates the great desire that most of us have to do something, to respond to these glorious moments, to somehow preserve and perpetuate the wonder and mystery of holy experiences. Here is a holy place and it ought to be marked by some monument so that we can find it again and perhaps be touched by the glory again and again. Building something to honor, to proclaim, to testify to, to reflect the "mysterium tremendum" of the holy in our lives is deeply ingrained in us. One only needs to look around at the churches, synagogues, cathedrals, mosques, temples to see how magnificently the desire to reflect the transcendent into the physical is.
On the dark side there are tons of concrete and steel that have been built by religious people in order simply to keep a congregation together on some visible goal. It is well acknowledged by religious leaders that congregations need goals and visions. That all congregations want to be "doing the Lord's work" and successful religious leaders quickly discover that the best goal is a new building, or a renovation project. "Always keep them in debt and always have something that they need to build and you will have much better luck keeping the community together." College Presidents have the same understanding.
But Jesus does not dignify the suggestion of Peter by a response. In fact, as they come off the mountain he tells his disciples not even to mention it to anybody until after his death and resurrection. Jesus does not seem to have the least little interest in buildings and structures. His consistent focus is on living a life that is befitting the Kingdom of God. He talks about the Beatitudes as to who will be blessed in the Kingdom. "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and spirit and love your neighbor as yourself." His judgment at the end is suggested to be on how you treated the poor, the naked, the thirst, the prisoner, without any thought about how it might benefit you.
Which seems to me to suggest that if we do have this deep innate desire to respond to the Holy and to bear witness to the holy by building something, then we might do very well to focus primarily on building homes for the homeless, building health care centers for the poor, paying for legal defense of the defenseless, digging wells for clean water in dry lands, on building better schools for all children. The best response to the revelation that Jesus is the one through him we most clearly see the love and grace of God is not to build more booths, but to share that love with others by building a better community for those who need it.
It is equally fascinating to me that Jesus completely ignores that suggestion. Certainly Peter demonstrates the great desire that most of us have to do something, to respond to these glorious moments, to somehow preserve and perpetuate the wonder and mystery of holy experiences. Here is a holy place and it ought to be marked by some monument so that we can find it again and perhaps be touched by the glory again and again. Building something to honor, to proclaim, to testify to, to reflect the "mysterium tremendum" of the holy in our lives is deeply ingrained in us. One only needs to look around at the churches, synagogues, cathedrals, mosques, temples to see how magnificently the desire to reflect the transcendent into the physical is.
On the dark side there are tons of concrete and steel that have been built by religious people in order simply to keep a congregation together on some visible goal. It is well acknowledged by religious leaders that congregations need goals and visions. That all congregations want to be "doing the Lord's work" and successful religious leaders quickly discover that the best goal is a new building, or a renovation project. "Always keep them in debt and always have something that they need to build and you will have much better luck keeping the community together." College Presidents have the same understanding.
But Jesus does not dignify the suggestion of Peter by a response. In fact, as they come off the mountain he tells his disciples not even to mention it to anybody until after his death and resurrection. Jesus does not seem to have the least little interest in buildings and structures. His consistent focus is on living a life that is befitting the Kingdom of God. He talks about the Beatitudes as to who will be blessed in the Kingdom. "Love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul, and spirit and love your neighbor as yourself." His judgment at the end is suggested to be on how you treated the poor, the naked, the thirst, the prisoner, without any thought about how it might benefit you.
Which seems to me to suggest that if we do have this deep innate desire to respond to the Holy and to bear witness to the holy by building something, then we might do very well to focus primarily on building homes for the homeless, building health care centers for the poor, paying for legal defense of the defenseless, digging wells for clean water in dry lands, on building better schools for all children. The best response to the revelation that Jesus is the one through him we most clearly see the love and grace of God is not to build more booths, but to share that love with others by building a better community for those who need it.
Friday, February 6, 2009
My Turn
I am very excited about my trip tomorrow. I leave for New Orleans to join a group of other volunteers in a project called Rebuilding Together, New Orleans. It is now my turn to go to New Orleans and help. Other groups have gone and done their work and I have rejoiced as each group has gone, but I have not been able to go. But now there is a work project and I have time, and so I go.
Rebuilding Together is a group which works with Preservation National on rebuilding and preserving homes. In much the way Habitat works, Rebuilding Together works primarily on repairs and restorations. I am not sure that they build any from the ground up.
I do not know anybody in this group. I will meet 19 other people and we will try to become a work team. This program provides room and board for its volunteers at a fee of $250 for a week. They supervise the work and have the work planned and organized. They ask me questions about my abilities and like so many other times, I did not know how to answer. How skilled are you at carpentry? Well, I can cut a board and nail it, but not as quickly as others and not always as neatly as I would like. Plumbing? well, I can fix my commode and change washers and know about cut off values, but glue and wrap PVC,I am not sure. Electricity? I am great with wires, boxes, and all electrical matters, when there is no electricity in the line, but I do not play with them when they are "alive." Roofing? I have roofed my whole workshop, but it did not have valleys and chimneys and complications. So I tried to say I was better than some and not as handy as others, but we shall see how it goes. They let me come. I can surely push a wheelbarrow.
This will make me very happy, and I hope that it will do somebody in New Orleans some good. But I know that I am late to this work. The urgency is way past, and the people who need this help have been suffering too long. I know it is better than doing nothing, but blessed are those who responded immediately.
Rebuilding Together is a group which works with Preservation National on rebuilding and preserving homes. In much the way Habitat works, Rebuilding Together works primarily on repairs and restorations. I am not sure that they build any from the ground up.
I do not know anybody in this group. I will meet 19 other people and we will try to become a work team. This program provides room and board for its volunteers at a fee of $250 for a week. They supervise the work and have the work planned and organized. They ask me questions about my abilities and like so many other times, I did not know how to answer. How skilled are you at carpentry? Well, I can cut a board and nail it, but not as quickly as others and not always as neatly as I would like. Plumbing? well, I can fix my commode and change washers and know about cut off values, but glue and wrap PVC,I am not sure. Electricity? I am great with wires, boxes, and all electrical matters, when there is no electricity in the line, but I do not play with them when they are "alive." Roofing? I have roofed my whole workshop, but it did not have valleys and chimneys and complications. So I tried to say I was better than some and not as handy as others, but we shall see how it goes. They let me come. I can surely push a wheelbarrow.
This will make me very happy, and I hope that it will do somebody in New Orleans some good. But I know that I am late to this work. The urgency is way past, and the people who need this help have been suffering too long. I know it is better than doing nothing, but blessed are those who responded immediately.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Who Will Be Left?
The press, the TV people, the internet are full of stories about the picture of Michael Phelps smoking pot. He has been quick to admit that it is a real picture of him. He has acknowledged that he has made a mistake, and he has apologized to anybody who was bothered by his actions. The mountain out of this molehill is another example of our temptation to forget the humanity of our heroes. Michael has been a man under discipline for more than eight years. After four years of training and swimming he was arrested for a DUI in 2004. After four more years of intense training he was pictured trying pot. He is after all a college youth who has denied himself a whole host of activities that most college youths take for granted. So a couple of times in eight years he allows himself to try something that the rest of the college young people have tried. He does not handle them well because he does not have much experience at how to handle them. He makes a mistake. He is not perfect. He is a human being.
It is a basic affirmation of our Christian faith that all of us are not perfect. It seems to be one of the hardest doctrine in the Christian faith for us to get into our thinking. The orthodox affirmation that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" means that there is evil and something less than perfect about all of us. The continuation of that doctrine, "the total depravity of humanity," suggests that like sugar that gets dissolved in a glass of water evil is a part of all we are. The best of us and our best deeds always have a tiny taint of that selfishness that is seen most clearly in our worst times and most evil acts.
That should mean that as Christian people we are never surprised when that evil suddenly becomes visible in a person. In fact, we ought to be expecting it to be there. The neighbors are always saying that so and so was a very quiet neighbor and we never thought he or she would do that kind of thing. Well, why not? The neighbor was a human being. Of course, the evil shows up in lots of different ways in different people. Madoff's selfishness in the Ponzi scheme is different from the evil of Timothy McVeigh but both of them believed themselves to be their own gods, the one to decide what was right and wrong.
As long as we are going to eliminate a person from a role model, from a job, from a position of respect everytime we catch a glimpse of the "not perfect" in them, we are going to discover that there is nobody left to look up to. The much more important criteria is what they do when the "not perfect" in them comes out. Phelps has quickly and honestly acknowledged his. Richard Nixon never acknowledged his. If we keep looking for somebody without sin to be our hero, to be our leader, to be our role model, then we find the options reduced to one in the Christian faith, and even He was quick to be baptized for the remission of sin by John the Baptist
It is a basic affirmation of our Christian faith that all of us are not perfect. It seems to be one of the hardest doctrine in the Christian faith for us to get into our thinking. The orthodox affirmation that "all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God" means that there is evil and something less than perfect about all of us. The continuation of that doctrine, "the total depravity of humanity," suggests that like sugar that gets dissolved in a glass of water evil is a part of all we are. The best of us and our best deeds always have a tiny taint of that selfishness that is seen most clearly in our worst times and most evil acts.
That should mean that as Christian people we are never surprised when that evil suddenly becomes visible in a person. In fact, we ought to be expecting it to be there. The neighbors are always saying that so and so was a very quiet neighbor and we never thought he or she would do that kind of thing. Well, why not? The neighbor was a human being. Of course, the evil shows up in lots of different ways in different people. Madoff's selfishness in the Ponzi scheme is different from the evil of Timothy McVeigh but both of them believed themselves to be their own gods, the one to decide what was right and wrong.
As long as we are going to eliminate a person from a role model, from a job, from a position of respect everytime we catch a glimpse of the "not perfect" in them, we are going to discover that there is nobody left to look up to. The much more important criteria is what they do when the "not perfect" in them comes out. Phelps has quickly and honestly acknowledged his. Richard Nixon never acknowledged his. If we keep looking for somebody without sin to be our hero, to be our leader, to be our role model, then we find the options reduced to one in the Christian faith, and even He was quick to be baptized for the remission of sin by John the Baptist
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)